www.spaceisle.com

Help Us Open the Solar System Frontier!
Space Frontier Foundation logo
Advancing NewSpace
FOUNDATION HOMEPAGE
Share your views on Space with your elected representatives! Enter your zip and click above to get info and links to your state and local members of Congress.
FOUNDATION PROJECTS
Return to the Moon
Teachers in Space
SpaceContest
NewSpace Economic Development
Space Settlement
The Cosmos Review
Permission to Dream
The Watch
Mars
Previous Projects
EVENTS
Events Homepage
Additional Events
RESOURCES
Space Store
NewSpace News
Subscribe to Updates
Space Companies
Advocates
Bulletin Boards
Affiliates
Web Links
You can listen to Foundation Advocate Dr. David Livingston's radio show
The Space Show
by clicking above.
Opinion Editorial
Media Contact: 800-787-7223 or press@space-frontier.org
Do We Go to Play? Or Do We Go to Stay?

By Rick Tumlinson, for Space News, November 21, 2005 – NASA has finally presented its plan for sending some government employees to the Moon and Mars using the solid-rocket boosters and stacked shuttle plan (spaceman-on-a-stick and shuttlesaurus). Well-timed as usual, it was sandwiched in between disasters and bad press for a weakened president.

Having been given the chance to reinvent themselves by the president's vision, they defaulted to type. Ignoring any lessons we might have learned from past mega-contractor fiascoes, they dropped the core goals of establishing a permanent presence in space, left the standing army of cost-plus contractors in place, cut out the innovative NewSpace firms who want to work on the project (or, as in the case of the Centennial Challenges left them to twist in the wind).

So if I may, I humbly offer a couple of observations and ideas for what to do next. First, regarding the so-called Apollo on steroids (or as I call Apollo old, fat and ugly): It's dead Mike. That horse won't run. That dog won't hunt. The fat lady has sung. Or, to bring it closer to space, I'll quote Bill Paxton in the film Aliens: "Game over man!"

The bloated, business as usual, cost-plus, pork-based, design-bureau use-it-and-throw-it-away approach to space is a failure. The excitement and momentum that might have existed when the president aimed us toward the Moon, Mars and beyond has been squandered. It has been worn down by the dumping of vision in favor of pork, and the jettisoning of the President and Aldridge Commission's declarations that frontier infrastructure building based on commercial enterprise is a prime goal. Dumped in favor of getting a few folks on the Moon relatively quickly (for these timid times) and pretending that this will lead us on to Mars – with no intention of making either location supportable long term.

So what should NASA do now?

Let's begin by getting one thing clear: When it comes to sending humans into space, either we go to play, or we go to stay. If we go to play, to plant the flag and say we crossed the goal line, then wait a few months, have your contractors change the pictures and vehicle names on their powerpoint pioneering presentations and roll them back out. But understand this, if by some miracle you get funded, you are screwing future generations out of the grandest legacy of all times, and wasting taxpayer funds on a zombie-like walk towards the dead end of flags and footprints. But if that is fun for you and you can live with it, then go for it.

If however, our goal is expanding our civilization permanently into space, (I think you said that to the media recently did you not Mr. Griffin?) then we need a whole different set of choices and decisions. It will also take courage, a commitment to really make substantial changes in how our space program operates, and a willingness to drop pet ideas in favor of ideas that will support the real goal of our human space program – the American led opening and settlement of the frontier.

Refocusing the plan with permanence and settlement as the goal, then we must redefine the role of the public and private sectors when compared to all other past NASA activities in space. Primarily, you will have to study, ingest and operate from the principles that make this free enterprise democracy wealthy enough to give you jobs in the first place, You will have to restructure contracting methods to reward achievement and radical innovation rather than effort and incrementalism, and ask some who are used to centrally designing and controlling such things as transportation and operations to be satisfied with simply getting the job done rather than doing it themselves. And, here's a tough one for you. Sometimes you are going to have to trust in American business and let them lead – with your support. Interestingly, this approach gets you an affordable, lower-overhead, sustainable and eventually even profit-creating process. Just these changes will send a signal of hope and opportunity and eventually widen the political constituency for settlement by creating jobs, wealth, and firing the imaginations of American taxpayers.

Here are a few more specific suggestions:
NASA (with Congress) should change its central contracting method to pay for services and pay for delivery. It should make cost-plus contracts the exception rather than the norm. Multi-year appropriations should be a part of this package.
Starting with low Earth orbit, NASA should set up a management authority to run at least our part of the international space station (ISS) and mandate that its focus be on supporting and enabling commercial infrastructure. At the same time, that authority should not encourage commercial activities on ISS that might compete with real enterprises such as the space facility being developed by Bigelow Aerospace.
All nation-to-nation barter deals should be banned unless a U.S. commercial solution has been tried first. On the other hand, NASA should push for exemptions to the export controls known as the International Trafficking in Arms Regulations to encourage international commercial partnerships.
Greatly expand the Centennial Challenges program.
Immediately cut contracts for commercial ISS resupply and eventually propellant transport to LEO.
Immediately allocate money for vouchers, to help kick start the NewSpace sub-orbital transportation industry, creating a market for ever higher rides for science payloads, astronauts and even teachers.
Announce the shuttle program is over except for one last glorious flight to save the Hubble telescope. The agency should swallow a little short-term pride and buy a package deal of astronaut rides on the Soyuz (buy them at the current commercial rate, and get a discount for quantity - this really works every day outside of government).
If NASA cannot wiggle out of agreements to carry ISS components, often cited as the reason for keeping the shuttle going, either quickly build a shuttle-based side mounted, arm equipped, low-tech container or convert one of the shuttles to remote control (DARPA and the Russians know how to do this one).
With money saved by canceling the shuttle NASA should offer at least three U.S. firms a total of $10 billion for the first demonstrations of fully reusable people carriers to low Earth orbit – to be delivered by 2010.
NASA should offer the winners multiyear contracts to carry astronauts to ISS and to board the trans-lunar spacecraft. Offer to pay them around $5 million per LEO ride, and let them sell the extra seats to anyone they want.

Back to the Moon - Frontier Style
Moving outwards, the Moon/Mars architecture should be redesigned to one that is frontier enabling rather than a dead end.
NASA should restart its long lead research support for interplanetary spaceships such as Prometheus and nuclear power sources for use in space.
NASA should begin development of fully reusable LEO/Moon transportation systems.
The agency should make all lunar robotic missions frontier science oriented, surveying resources and sites for the place we will put our first base. Once selected, focus efforts on the chosen site and its environs.
Load the landers with commercially sponsored energy production and In Situ Resource Utilization experiments and send rovers to explore the shadows and ice.
There should also be a priority search for big money payoffs like asteroid impact based platinum.
Build up the base using transportation/habitation systems that are designed to be rough, tough and growable – nothing expendable allowed.
Put out a long-term lease-based prize/contingency contract to rent lunar surface habitats from the first two firms to demonstrate them here on Earth by keeping them going for six months or so in a lunar analogous environment.

The Whole Package
Wrap all of this in a comprehensive package that you can sell to the people and Congress that is about opening the frontier for all of us! The focus should be on context, clarity, cohesiveness and common sense.

The American people need to know this is going somewhere, they need to see the point, they need to feel you are thinking long term, and they need to know you are not wasting their money. This is what NASA is missing right now. Show how each element leads inevitably toward our first outpost on the Moon and Mars, how they support the emerging private sector and help enable a renaissance in U.S. space. Show how it benefits the people through easier access to space themselves, potential new resources, inspiration for education, technological leadership, and sheer national pride and hope.

Mr. Griffin, you can then point with your own pride at the race to build the first new orbital rocket ships and buildings in space and what it will mean as competition brings the costs down to show how wisely you are investing the taxpayer's money.

You can point to real lunar base developments people can watch on TV, and the first images coming back from the lunar poles as brave little NASA rovers named in student contests and carrying student experiments march off into the shadows while announcers explain the importance of ice/water to living on other worlds.

But you can't just talk the talk. You must walk the walk. You will have to fight for this. It cannot be an afterthought, it cannot be plan B. You will encounter resistance. You will encounter turf-oriented twisting of the goal. You will have to tip over a few rice bowls. You will alienate some old constituents – but you will create many new ones.

Look, the game isn't really over. It is just that you have been playing the wrong game with the wrong goal. Change it. Change it now and make that your legacy, for it will be a grand one. I am certain if you do we will be on the Moon and Mars sooner than expected, and at much less cost than the current plan. You will be seeding a NewSpace renaissance and put in place the building blocks of a permanent and expanding frontier.

Then we can both stay and play – except this time for keeps.


Rick Tumlinson is the Founder of the Space Frontier Foundation.


The Space Frontier Foundation is an organization of people dedicated to opening the Space Frontier to human settlement as rapidly as possible. Our goals include protecting the Earth's fragile biosphere and creating a freer and more prosperous life for each generation by using the unlimited energy and material resources of space. Our purpose is to unleash the power of free enterprise and lead a united humanity permanently into the Solar System.

ABOUT THE FOUNDATION
Accomplishments
Who We Are
Leaders
Advisors
Policies
Action Reports
International
History
Annual Awards
NEWS & MEDIA
Press Releases
Op-Eds & Letters
Presentations, Speeches & White Papers
Political Reference
In the News
Other Voices
CONTACT US
Send Us Your Comments
Join the Fight!

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=ur2&camp=1789&tag=spacefrontier-20&creative=9325&path=ASIN/189652267X/qid=1119587815/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1
The High Frontier is Gerard K. O'Neill's masterpiece. This new 3rd Edition Includes an introduction by Freeman Dyson.
Click above to order The High Frontier from Amazon.com.

The Frontier Enabling Test
Our definition of a "frontier enabling" technology or policy is one which has as its effect the acceleration of the creation of low cost access to the space frontier for private citizens and companies, enables or accelerates our use of space resources, and/or accelerates the rate at which wealth can be generated in space. In other words, is the project or policy going to provide a return on the national investment, if we define "return" to be the economically sustainable human habitation of space?

For more information call 800-78-SPACE (800-787-7223)
or
send us your comments

Foundation Logo

Banner artwork by Mark Maxwell
Webmaster: Peter Thorpe
pthorpe@space-frontier.org

Copyright © 1996 - 2008 Space Frontier Foundation. All rights reserved.
All work contained herein is protected by United States copyright/ intellectual property law.